JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 12 October 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:2062-2071 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0483
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitmire, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitmire, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, S. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Whitmire, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, S. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Wetland Soils

Rapid Removal of Nitrate and Sulfate in Freshwater Wetland Sediments

Stefanie L. Whitmirea,b and Stephen K. Hamiltona,*

a W.K. Kellogg Biological Station and Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, 3700 East Gull Lake Drive, Hickory Corners, MI 49060
b Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez, Departamento de Agronomía y Suelos, PO Box 9030, Mayagüez, PR 00681-9030



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Reactive and conservative (Br–) tracer concentrations in two push–pull experiments representing wetlands of contrasting hydrology: (A) ground water–fed Turkey Marsh and (B) precipitation-fed Lux Pond 10.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Ratios of reactant to conservative tracer concentrations in two push–pull experiments representing wetlands of contrasting hydrology: (A) ground water–fed wetland Turkey Marsh and (B) precipitation-fed Lux Pond 10.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Comparison of the difference between observed and expected concentrations of NO3– and SO42– in the two examples of push–pull experiments that were shown in Fig. 1 and 2: (A) ground water–fed Turkey Marsh and (B) precipitation-fed Lux Pond 10.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.