JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 9 August 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:1581-1590 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0005
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilcke, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilcke, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wilcke, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Soil Pollution

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Soils of the Moscow Region— Concentrations, Temporal Trends, and Small-Scale Distribution

Wolfgang Wilckea,*, Martin Kraussa, Grigorij Safronova, Alexej D. Fokinb and Martin Kaupenjohanna

a Department of Soil Science, Institute of Ecology, Berlin University of Technology, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
b Department of Radioecology, Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 49 Timiryazevskaya str., Moscow, 127550, Russian Federation



View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of the study sites.

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mean pattern of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (a) in recent Russian topsoils (collected 1996–2003) and North American Prairie topsoils (Wilcke and Amelung, 2000) and (b) in Russian topsoils archived between 1910 and 1922. In (b) additionally the pattern of PAHs in the Bronnitsi topsoil sample of 1922, an outlier, and in the Schapovo topsoil sample of 1954 is shown. ACEN, acenaphthene; ACENY, acenaphthylene; ANTH, anthracene; B(A)A, benz(a) anthracene; B(A)P, benzo(a)pyrene; B(BJK), benzo(b+j+k)-fluoranthenes; B(E)P, benzo(e)pyrene; B(GHI), benzo(ghi)perylene; CHRY, chrysene + triphenylene; COR, coronene; DIBE, dibenz-(a,h)anthracene; FLUA, fluoranthene; FLUO, fluorene; IND, indeno-(1,2,3-cd)pyrene; NAPH, naphthalene; PERY, perylene; PHEN, phenanthrene; PYR, pyrene.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relation between distance to the center of Moscow and the recent mean concentrations of the sum of 21 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ({Sigma}21PAHs) normalized to the concentration of soil organic carbon (SOC) (n = 3 for each of the forest and grassland sites, except n = 2 for the grassland samples collected at Nenashevo in 1996). Error bars represent standard errors. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences of the means at p < 0.05 (Games Howell post hoc test).

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relation between distance to the center of Moscow and the recent mean contributions of the low-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (NAPH, ACENY, ACEN, FLUO, PHEN, and ANTH) to the concentrations of the sum of 21 PAHs (n = 3 for each of the forest and grassland sites, except n = 2 for the grassland samples collected at Nenashevo in 1996). Error bars represent standard errors. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences of the means at p < 0.05 (Games Howell post hoc test). ACEN, acenaphthene; ACENY, acenaphthylene; ANTH, anthracene; FLUO, fluorene; NAPH, naphthalene; PHEN, phenanthrene.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mean distribution of the concentrations of the sum of 21 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ({Sigma}21PAHs) among the soil without large aggregates (<10 mm) and the interior and exterior of macroaggregates > 10 mm in soils archived between 1910 and 1922 (n = 6) and in soils sampled between 1996 and 2000 (n = 10) expressed in % of the concentrations of the {Sigma}21PAHs in bulk soil. Error bars represent standard errors.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Mean pattern of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the soil without large aggregates (<10 mm) and the interior and exterior of macroaggregates in soils sampled between 1996 and 2000 (n = 10–12). ACEN, acenaphthene; ACENY, acenaphthylene; ANTH, anthracene; B(A)A, benz(a)anthracene; B(A)P, benzo(a)pyrene; B(BJK), benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthenes; B(E)P, benzo(e)pyrene; B(GHI), benzo(ghi)perylene; CHRY, chrysene + triphenylene; COR, coronene; DIBE, dibenz(a,h)anthracene; FLUA, fluoranthene; FLUO, fluorene; IND, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene; NAPH, naphthalene; PERY, perylene; PHEN, phenanthrene; PYR, pyrene.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Mean concentration ratio of the sum of 21 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ({Sigma}21PAHs) in the aggregate exterior to the interior in soils archived between 1910 and 1922 (n = 6) and in soils sampled between 1996 and 2000 (n = 10). Error bars represent standard errors.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.