JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 9 August 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:1539-1546 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0002
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matocha, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matocha, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, K. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matocha, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, K. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Redox Processes
Right arrow Heavy Metals

Reduction of Copper(II) by Iron(II)

C. J. Matocha*, A. D. Karathanasis, S. Rakshit and K. M. Wagner

Department of Agronomy, University of Kentucky, N-122 Agricultural Science Center-North, Lexington, KY 40546-0091



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Dissolved Cu and Fe concentrations over time under anoxic conditions with initial metal concentrations of 1.0 mM and (a) 2 mM [Cl], (b) 4 mM [Cl], and (c) 0.1 M [Cl]. Reactions contained 0.1 M pH 5.5 MES buffer.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dissolved Cu and Fe concentrations over time under anoxic conditions with initial metal concentrations of 9.1 mM and (a) 0.04 M [Cl] and (b) 0.1 M [Cl]. Experiments were performed in water and an automatic titrator was used to maintain a pH of 5.2 ± 0.2.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns of the solid-phase precipitates collected after 60 min of reaction time for 0.04 M and 0.10 M [Cl] treatments, and (b) corresponding plots of base added during the precipitation reactions. Reactions contained 9.1 mM Cu(II) and Fe(II) and were performed at pH 5.2 ± 0.2 in water.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the solid-phase precipitates collected after 60 min of reaction time for 0.04 M and 0.10 M [Cl] treatments. Reactions contained 9.1 mM Cu(II) and Fe(II) and were performed at pH 5.2 ± 0.2 in water.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Representative scanning electron microscope image of precipitates after 60 min of reaction time for the 0.1 M [Cl] treatment and corresponding energy dispersive X-ray spectra shown below. Reactions contained 9.1 mM Cu(II) and Fe(II) and were performed at pH 5.2 ± 0.2 in water. Scale bar equals 2 µm.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.