JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 9 August 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:1490-1496 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0471
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ouyang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ouyang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L. Q.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ouyang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L. Q.
Related Collections
Right arrow Root Growth/Water Uptake Models
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation

Simulation of Phytoremediation of a TNT-Contaminated Soil Using the CTSPAC Model

Y. Ouyanga,*, D. Shindeb and L. Q. Mab

a Department of Water Resources, St. Johns River Water Management District, P.O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL 32178-1429
b Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0290



View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram showing a compartment model for chemical transport within a plant system. The numbers are the plant compartment numbers.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Comparison of the predicted and the measured TNT concentrations in soil and roots during model calibration process.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Average hourly xylem water potential in roots, stem, and leaves of the poplar tree.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Simulated xylem water potentials in (a) roots, (b) stem, and (c) leaves as a function of time.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Simulated (a) root water uptake and (b) soil TNT concentration as a function of time.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Simulated TNT mass in (a) roots, (b) soil, and (c) bioavailability as a function of time. Bioavailability is the ratio of the contaminant mass (Mw) in soil solution (which is readily taken up by plants) to the contaminant mass (MT) in the soil.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.