JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 May 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:1026-1035 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.0238
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ingwersen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Streck, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ingwersen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Streck, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ingwersen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Streck, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Municipal Wastes
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Other Models
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions
Right arrow Soil Pollution

A Regional-Scale Study on the Crop Uptake of Cadmium from Sandy Soils

Measurement and Modeling

Joachim Ingwersen* and Thilo Streck

University of Hohenheim, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, Biogeophysics Section, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Relationship between topsoil Cd concentration in soil solution and plant Cd contents in 1998 and 1999 for (A) winter wheat, (B) sugar beet, and (C) potato. For winter wheat, ordinate values give the Cd content in grain. For sugar beet and potato, ordinate values represent the Cd content of the whole plant.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Measured versus predicted Cd contents of (A) winter wheat, (B) sugar beet, and (C) potato. Predictions assume a passive uptake and are based on parameters either measured or taken from the literature; only sugar beet kP was fitted. In each panel the modeling efficiency (EF) is given. The black open circle in (C) points to four potato samples with a particularly strong disagreement between model and measurement.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Measured versus predicted Cd contents of potato plants. With the help of a two-step cluster analysis the data pairs were grouped in three clusters. The cluster criterion was the residuum between predicted and measured value.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Measured versus predicted Cd contents of potato plants (modeling efficiency [EF] = 87%). Data were grouped in three clusters. For each cluster a specific plant factor {eta} was fitted.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Sensitivity analysis of model input parameters. The reference simulation was done using the following parameters: C(z = 0–30 cm) = 1 µg L–1, C(z > 30 cm) = 0 µg L–1, kP = 4 Pa, {Delta}e = 700 Pa, QHM = 10, QY = 0.5, {eta} = 1, and {omega} = 8 m–1.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.