JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, D. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Blazejewski, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, D. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Blazejewski, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, D. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Blazejewski, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wetland Soils
Right arrow Ground Water Quality
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Nitrogen

In Situ Ground Water Denitrification in Stratified, Permeable Soils Underlying Riparian Wetlands

D. Q. Kellogga,*, A. J. Golda, P. M. Groffmanb, K. Addya, M. H. Stolta and G. Blazejewskia

a Department of Natural Resources Science, 105 Coastal Institute in Kingston, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881
b Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Box AB, 65 Sharon Turnpike, Millbrook, NY 12545



View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of study Sites A, B, C, and D within the Pawcatuck River Watershed, Rhode Island, USA.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Comparison of ground water denitrification rates from mini-piezometers that were sampled over two years, but during the same season. Rates from Year 1 were significantly correlated with rates from Year 2 with r = 0.91 at P < 0.05.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Mean annual riparian ground water denitrification rates versus distance from the stream at (a) 150 cm and (b) 260 to 300 cm below the soil surface. Spearman rank correlations between denitrification rates and distance from the stream were significant at P < 0.01. Error bars signify ±1 SE.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Mean annual riparian ground water denitrification rates versus weighted average soil carbon content at (a) 65 cm and (b) 150 cm below the soil surface. Spearman rank correlations between denitrification rates and the weighted average of % C in samples from horizons at (a) 55 to 75 cm and (b) 140 to 160 cm below the soil surface were not significant. Error bars signify ±1 SE (n = 6).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.