JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bettahar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bettahar, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bettahar, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Microorganisms
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Microbial and Colloid Transport Models

Straining, Attachment, and Detachment of Cryptosporidium Oocysts in Saturated Porous Media

S. A. Bradforda,* and M. Bettaharb

a USDA-ARS, George E. Brown Jr. Salinity Laboratory, 450 W. Big Springs Road, Riverside, CA 92507-4617
b Parsons, 100 West Walnut Street, Pasadena, CA 91124



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Plots of observed and simulated Cryptosporidium oocyst effluent concentration curves in the (a) 710-µm, (b) 360-µm, and (c) 150-µm sands. Here relative effluent concentrations (C Ci–1) are plotted as a function of pore volumes. Simulations considered attachment (Model-Att), attachment and detachment (Model-Att/Det), straining (Model-Str), and attachment, detachment, and straining (Model-Att/Det/Str). Corresponding spatial distributions of the retained oocysts in these sands are shown in Fig. 2. Fitted model parameters are presented in Table 2.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Plots of observed and simulated spatial distributions of Cryptosporidium oocyst retained in the (a) 710-µm, (b) 360-µm, and (c) 150-µm sands. Here the normalized concentration (No Nto–1) per gram of dry sand is plotted as a function of dimensionless depth (distance from column inlet divided by column length). Simulations considered attachment (Model-Att), attachment and detachment (Model-Att/Det), straining (Model-Str), and attachment, detachment, and straining (Model-Att/Det/Str). Corresponding oocyst effluent concentration curves are presented in Fig. 1. Fitted model parameters are presented in Table 2.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Predicted effluent concentrations curves (semi-log plot of relative effluent concentrations as a function of time) for oocysts in 710-µm sand at distances of 25, 50, and 100 cm from the inlet. Predictions were obtained using the attachment–detachment (Model-Att/Det) and the attachment–detachment–straining (Model-Att/Det/Str) conceptual models. Model parameters were determined by fitting (Table 2) to the experimental soil column data.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.