JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Selim, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Selim, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Selim, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Organic Compounds

Atrazine Sorption–Desorption Hysteresis by Sugarcane Mulch Residue

H. M. Selim* and H. Zhu

Sturgis Hall, Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803



View larger version (6K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A schematic of the proposed multireaction model (MRM) with equilibrium and kinetic adsorption sites and one first-order degradation (irreversible) reaction. The term C is concentration in soil solution, Se represents the amount sorbed on the equilibrium sites, Sk is that sorbed kinetic sites, and Si the amount retained irreversibly, where Ke, k1, k2, and k3 are the respective rates of reactions.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Adsorption isotherms of atrazine by sugarcane mulch residue at different reaction times. The solid lines are predictions using a linear model.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Measured atrazine distribution coefficient (Kd) versus adsorption reaction time for sugarcane mulch residue and Commerce soil. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Adsorption isotherms for atrazine by Commerce soil for 2-, 24-, and 384-h reaction times. Solid lines are predictions using a linear model.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Atrazine concentration in solution during adsorption and desorption versus time. Results are from the batch kinetic experiment having a mulch to solution ratio of 1:30 and for several initial concentrations (Ci). The curves are multireaction model (MRM) predictions using the overall set of model parameters given in Table 2.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Amount of atrazine sorbed by sugarcane mulch residue. Results are from the batch kinetic experiment having a mulch to solution ratio of 1:30 and for several initial concentrations (Ci). The curves are multireaction model (MRM) predictions using the overall set of model parameters given in Table 2.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Traditional desorption isotherms of atrazine by sugarcane mulch residue. The solid line is the adsorption isotherm for the 504-h reaction. The dashed curves are predictions using the (a) multireaction model (MRM) and (b) Freundlich model.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Time-dependent desorption isotherms of atrazine by sugarcane mulch residue. The solid line is the adsorption isotherm for the 504-h reaction. The dashed curves are predictions using the (a) multireaction model (MRM) and (b) Freundlich model.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.