JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalbasi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Karthikeyan, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalbasi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Karthikeyan, K. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kalbasi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Karthikeyan, K. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Animal Waste

Phosphorus Dynamics in Soils Receiving Chemically Treated Dairy Manure

M. Kalbasi and K. G. Karthikeyan*

Biological Systems Engineering Department, 460 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of treatment type and incubation time on water-extractable phosphorus (WEP) for (a) Soil I, (b) Soil II, and (c) Soil III at the high (25 mg P kg–1) manure application rate. Cont., control; M-H, manure with high P application rate; ATM-H, Al-treated manure with high P application rate; ITM-H, Fe-treated manure with high P application rate; LTM-H, Ca-treated manure with high P application rate. Error bars show plus and minus one standard deviation.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of treatment type and incubation time on water-extractable phosphorus (WEP) for (a) Soil I, (b) Soil II, and (c) Soil III at the low (12.5 mg P kg–1) manure application rate. Cont., control; M-L, manure with low P application rate; ATM-L, Al-treated manure with low P application rate; ITM-L, Fe-treated manure with low P application rate; LTM-L, Ca-treated manure with low P application rate. Error bars show plus and minus one standard deviation.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of treatment type on the fraction of applied P released as water-extractable phosphorus (WEP), termed as percent WEP released. M-L, manure with low P application rate; M-H, manure with high P application rate; ATM-L, Al-treated manure with low P application rate; ATM-H, Al-treated manure with high P application rate; ITM-L, Fe-treated manure with low P application rate; ITM-H, Fe-treated manure with high P application rate; LTM-L, Ca-treated manure with low P application rate; LTM-H, Ca-treated manure with high P application rate.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of treatment type and incubation time on Bray-1 P for (a) Soil I, (b) Soil II, and (c) Soil III at the high (25 mg P kg–1) manure application rate. Cont., control; M-H, manure with high P application rate; ATM-H, Al-treated manure with high P application rate; ITM-H, Fe-treated manure with high P application rate; LTM-H, Ca-treated manure with high P application rate. Error bars show plus and minus one standard deviation.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of treatment type and incubation time on Bray-1 P for (a) Soil I, (b) Soil II, and (c) Soil III at the low (12.5 mg P kg–1) manure application rate. Cont., control; M-L, manure with low P application rate; ATM-L, Al-treated manure with low P application rate; ITM-L, Fe-treated manure with low P application rate; LTM-L, Ca-treated manure with low P application rate. Error bars show plus and minus one standard deviation.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of treatment type on the fraction of applied phosphorus released as Bray-1 phosphorus (PBray-1). M-L, manure with low P application rate; M-H, manure with high P application rate; ATM-L, Al-treated manure with low P application rate; ATM-H, Al-treated manure with high P application rate; ITM-L, Fe-treated manure with low P application rate; ITM-H, Fe-treated manure with high P application rate; LTM-L, Ca-treated manure with low P application rate; LTM-H, Ca-treated manure with high P application rate.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.