JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malone, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sumner, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malone, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sumner, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Malone, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sumner, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Preferential Flow
Right arrow Lysimeter/Rhizosphere Studies
Right arrow Pesticides
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

Residual and Contact Herbicide Transport through Field Lysimeters via Preferential Flow

R. W. Malonea,*, M. J. Shipitalob, R. D. Wauchopec and H. Sumnerd

a USDA Agricultural Research Service, National Soil Tilth Laboratory (NSTL), 2150 Pammel Drive, Ames, IA 50011
b USDA Agricultural Research Service, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed, Coshocton, OH 43812
c USDA Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory, Tifton, GA 31793
d Formerly with USDA Agricultural Research Service, Tifton, GA 31793



View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic and location of the Coshocton weighing lysimeters (not drawn to scale).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Lysimeter layout. The four lysimeters are designated Y103A, B, C, and D.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The six discrete samples collected after herbicide application in 1999. A concentration of 0.10 µg L–1 indicates not detected; a percolation rate of 0.001 mm h–1 indicates percolation rate was less than measurable.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Chemical concentration in percolate during the first 5.5 d after rainfall initiation (1000 h EST, 1 May 2000). The vertical lines represent the range of concentrations from the four lysimeters. The symbols represent the average alachlor and metribuzin concentration at approximately 0.06 and 0.09 d after rainfall initiation. The maximum concentrations occurred at approximately 0.10 d after rainfall initiation. Herbicide concentration determined from discrete samples except Days 2.2 and 5.5 were composite samples.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Logarithmic presentation of 2000 average concentration with 95% confidence intervals. Note that log(1) = 0, therefore the y intercept is at 1.00 d after rainfall initiation. Time zero is 1000 h EST, 1 May 2000 (rainfall initiation). The symbols represent the average alachlor and metribuzin concentration from the four lysimeters.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.