JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steinman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Steinman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Ecosystem Restoration

The Reduction of Internal Phosphorus Loading Using Alum in Spring Lake, Michigan

Alan Steinmana,*, Rick Rediskea and K. Ramesh Reddyb

a Annis Water Resources Inst., Grand Valley State Univ., 740 West Shoreline Dr., Muskegon, MI 49441
b Soil and Water Science Dep., Inst. of Food and Agric. Sci., 106 Newell Hall, P.O. Box 110510, Gainesville, FL 32611-0510



View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Site map of Spring Lake. Bottom panel: County outline of Michigan's lower peninsula, with blow-up of Ottawa County and location of Spring Lake (in box). Top panel: Blow-up of box from lower panel, showing Spring Lake and location of four sampling sites.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Selected limnological characteristics (temperature, dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll a) at Sites 1 to 4. Note different scales for the depth axis.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Total phosphorus (TP) release rates for sediment cores from Sites 1 to 4, exposed to four different treatments. O2 refers to aerobic treatment; N2 refers to anaerobic treatment. Data are means (n = 3) ± 1 SD. Note different scales for the y axis.

 


View larger version (50K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Top panel: concentration of NaOH–Pi (Fe/Al-bound P) in Spring Lake sediments. Bottom panel: Concentration of HCl–Pi (Ca/Mg-bound P) in Spring Lake sediments. O2 = aerobic treatment; N2 = anaerobic treatment; T = alum; C = control. Data are means (n = 3) ± 1 SD. Results from the ANOVA are presented in upper right corner of each panel.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.