JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Collins, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Microorganisms
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Agricultural Systems
Right arrow Water Pollution

Fecal Contamination of Pastoral Wetlands

Robert Collins*

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 11 115, Hamilton, New Zealand



View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Wetland map. "S" indicates that wetland outflow was sampled at this location for E. coli, "W" indicates the approximate location of the weir, and "P" indicates the location of the piezometer set.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Observed flow (L min–1) and low to moderate flow E. coli concentrations (most probable number [MPN] 100 mL–1) at Wetland A. The black bands at the top of the figure indicate periods of grazing. Note the E. coli concentration observed on 9 June was collected at a flow of 23 L min–1.

 


View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Scatter plot of flow (L min–1) against E. coli concentration (most probable number [MPN] 100 mL–1) sampled at low to moderate flow from Wetland A.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil water E. coli concentrations (most probable number [MPN] 100 mL–1) collected at depths of 60 to 85 cm, 2 m above the head of Wetland A.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Storm period flow (L min–1; y axis) and E. coli concentration (most probable number [MPN] 100 mL–1; second y axis) for five events at Wetland A (A1–A5) and two events at Wetland B (B1 and B2). Storm duration (h) is shown on the x axis. Note the change in scale for flow and E. coli concentration for Event A5, and for flow for Event B2. Time since the catchment was last grazed (d) is shown in parentheses.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.