JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Göthberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bengtsson, B.-E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Göthberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bengtsson, B.-E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Göthberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bengtsson, B.-E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vegetable Crops
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Toxic Trace Metals
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Water Pollution

Influence of Nutrient Levels on Uptake and Effects of Mercury, Cadmium, and Lead in Water Spinach

Agneta Göthberga,*, Maria Gregerb, Karin Holma and Bengt-Erik Bengtssona

a Institute of Applied Environmental Research (ITM), Laboratory for Aquatic Environmental Chemistry, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
b Department of Botany, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Weight increase (g fresh wt.) of untreated water spinach plants after 7 d at different nutrient levels. Values are means ± standard errors.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effects of combinations of nutrient strength (1, 25, and 100% Hoagland) and Hg concentrations on water spinach determined as (A) tolerance index (TI) for the weight increase (fresh weight) of the whole plant, (B) dry weight as percent of fresh weight of the whole plant (DW:FW), and (C) root dry weight as percent of whole-plant dry weight (R:WP). Values are means ± standard errors (n = 5), * = significant at the 0.05 probability level.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effects of combinations of nutrient strength (25 and 100% Hoagland) and Cd concentrations on water spinach determined as (A) tolerance index (TI) for the weight increase (fresh weight) of the whole plant, (B) dry weight as percent of fresh weight of the whole plant (DW:FW), and (C) root dry weight as percent of whole-plant dry weight (R:WP). Values are means ± standard errors (n = 4), * = significant at the 0.05 probability level.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effects of combinations of nutrient strength (10, 25, 50, and 100% Hoagland) and Pb concentrations on water spinach determined as (A) tolerance index (TI) for the weight increase (fresh weight) of the whole plant, (B) dry weight as percent of fresh weight of the whole plant (DW:FW), and (C) root dry weight as percent of whole-plant dry weight (R:WP). Values are means ± standard errors (n = 5), * = significant at the 0.05 probability level.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.