JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Langat, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Langat, J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hill, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Langat, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Soil Analysis

Denitrification Potential in Relation to Lithology in Five Headwater Riparian Zones

Alan R. Hill*, Philippe G. F. Vidon and Jackson Langat

Department of Geography, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of study sites.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Vertical cross-sections of (top) Highway 27, (middle) Vivian Creek, and (bottom) Maskinonge riparian zones showing lithology and saturated hydraulic conductivity (cm d–1) for piezometer openings (dots). The < term indicates hydraulic conductivity of <0.2 cm d–1. Dashed lines indicate the maximum and minimum water table positions during 2000–2002. Vertical arrows indicate the position of the riparian–field perimeter and stream bank. Numbers above represent piezometer nests and soil sampling locations.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Vertical cross-sections of (top) Ganatsekiagon and (bottom) Road 10 riparian zones showing lithology and saturated hydraulic conductivity (cm d–1) for piezometer openings (dots). The < term indicates hydraulic conductivity of <0.2 cm d–1. Dashed lines indicate the maximum and minimum water table during 2000–2002. Vertical arrows indicate the position of the riparian–field perimeter and stream bank. Numbers above represent piezometers nests and soil sampling locations.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Vertical texture profiles of the Ganatsekiagon and Highway 27 riparian zones. Numbers indicate soil sampling locations shown in Fig. 2 and 3.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Vertical texture profiles of the Vivian Creek and Road 10 riparian zones. Numbers indicate the soil sampling locations shown in Fig. 2 and 3.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Vertical profiles of organic matter content in the five riparian zones. Numbers on each profile indicate soil sampling locations shown in Fig. 2 and 3. Note that the horizontal scale differs among the riparian zones and the vertical scale for Road 10 differs from the scale of the other sites.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Vertical variations of potential denitrification (mg N kg–1 dry soil d–1) estimated from N2O accumulation between 2 and 5 h and after 24 and 72 h in the Highway 27 riparian zone (Sites 2 and 6). See Fig. 2 for site locations. The term T indicates <0.1 mg N kg–1 d–1, while N indicates no activity.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Vertical variations of potential denitrification (mg N kg–1 dry soil d–1) estimated from N2O accumulation between 2 and 5 h and after 24 and 72 h in the Vivian Creek riparian zone (Site 2 and 4) and Ganatsekiagon riparian zone (Site 1). See Fig. 2 and 3 for site locations. The term T indicates <0.1 mg N kg–1 d–1, while N indicates no activity.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Vertical variations of potential denitrification (mg N kg–1 dry soil d–1) estimated from N2O accumulation between 2 and 5 h and after 24 and 72 h in the Maskinonge riparian zone (Sites 4 and 7). See Fig. 2 for site locations. The term T indicates <0.1 mg N kg–1 d–1, while N indicates no activity.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Vertical variations of potential denitrification (mg N kg–1 dry soil d–1) estimated from N2O accumulation between 2 and 5 h and after 24 and 72 h in the Road 10 riparian zone (Sites 2, 3, and 5). See Fig. 3 for site locations. The term T indicates <0.1 mg N kg–1 d–1, while N indicates no activity.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Relationship between denitrification potential (DNP) and (top) subsurface sediment organic matter content and (bottom) subsurface sediment silt + clay content in the five riparian zones.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.