JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turner, B. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Turner, B. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Animal Waste

Optimizing Phosphorus Characterization in Animal Manures by Solution Phosphorus-31 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Benjamin L. Turner*

USDA-ARS, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Laboratory, 3793N. 3600E., Kimberly, ID 83341



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Phosphorus recovery (%) from animal manures in alkaline extracts containing 0.25 M NaOH and varying concentrations of EDTA (mM). Manures were extracted for 16 h at 20°C.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of extraction time on P recovery (%) from animal manures in 0.5 M NaOH + 50 mM EDTA.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Comparison of solution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of 0.25 M NaOH + 50 mM EDTA extracts of the three manures. Spectra are plotted using line broadening of 0.5 Hz (broiler litter), 1 Hz (swine manure), and 4 Hz (cattle manure).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Solution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of alkaline extracts of broiler litter extracted with different concentrations of NaOH (0.15, 0.25, and 0.50 M), and a constant concentration of 50 mM EDTA. All spectra are plotted using a line broadening of 0.5 Hz and scaled to the full height of the orthophosphate signal.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Solution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of alkaline extracts of swine manure extracted with different concentrations of NaOH (0.15, 0.25, and 0.50 M), and a constant concentration of 50 mM EDTA. All spectra are plotted using a line broadening of 1.0 Hz, except for the inset spectrum of the 0.50 M NaOH + 50 mM EDTA extract, which was plotted using a line broadening of 0.3 Hz to preserve the enhanced resolution obtained for this spectrum. The main spectra are scaled to show the largest orthophosphate monoester signal as 75% of the full height of the figure.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Solution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of alkaline extracts of cattle manure extracted with different concentrations of NaOH (0.15, 0.25, and 0.50 M), and a constant concentration of 50 mM EDTA. The main spectra are plotted using a line broadening of 4 Hz, while inset spectra are plotted using line broadening of 1 Hz for the 0.15 M NaOH + 50 mM EDTA extract, 2 Hz for the 0.25 M NaOH + 50 mM EDTA extract, and 4 Hz for the 0.50 M NaOH + 50 mM EDTA extract. The main spectra are scaled to show the largest orthophosphate monoester signal as 75% of the full height of the figure.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.