JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borken, W.
Right arrow Articles by Beese, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borken, W.
Right arrow Articles by Beese, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Borken, W.
Right arrow Articles by Beese, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forest Soils
Right arrow Municipal Waste
Right arrow Ground Water Quality
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment
Right arrow Ecosystem Restoration

Leaching of Dissolved Organic Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission after Compost Application to Six Nutrient-Depleted Forest Soils

Werner Borken*,a, Yi-Jun Xub and Friedrich Beesec

a Department of Soil Ecology, BITÖK, University of Bayreuth, Dr. Hans-Frisch-Straße 1-3, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
b School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
c Institute of Soil Science and Forest Nutrition, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077 Göttingen, Germany



View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mean (a) soil respiration rates, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in seepage water at (b) 10 cm and (c) 100 cm in the control and compost plots, and (d) monthly sums of throughfall and daily soil matric potentials at 10 cm in the beech forest at Solling (SB) from summer 1997 to spring 2000. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mean (a) soil respiration rates, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in seepage water at (b) 10 cm and (c) 100 cm in the control and compost plots, and (d) monthly sums of throughfall and daily soil matric potentials at 10 cm in the spruce forest at Solling (SS) from summer 1997 to spring 2000. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Mean (a) soil respiration rates, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in seepage water at (b) 10 cm and (c) 100 cm in the control and compost plots, and (d) monthly sums of throughfall and daily soil matric potentials at 10 cm in the pine forest at Solling (SP) from summer 1997 to spring 2000. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Mean (a) soil respiration rates, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in seepage water at (b) 10 cm and (c) 100 cm in the control and compost plots, and (d) monthly sums of throughfall and daily soil matric potentials at 10 cm in the beech forest at Unterlüß (UB) from summer 1997 to spring 2000. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mean (a) soil respiration rates, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in seepage water at (b) 10 cm and (c) 100 cm in the control and compost plots, and (d) monthly sums of throughfall and daily soil matric potentials at 10 cm in the spruce forest at Unterlüß (US) from summer 1997 to spring 2000. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Mean (a) soil respiration rates, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in seepage water at (b) 10 cm and (c) 100 cm in the control and compost plots, and (d) monthly sums of throughfall and daily soil matric potentials at 10 cm in the pine forest at Unterlüß (UP) from summer 1997 to spring 2000. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Percent of compost C found in seepage fluxes at 10 and 100 cm in the Solling and Unterlüß beech (SB, UB), spruce (SS, US), and pine (SP, UP) stands from August 1997 to March 2000.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.