JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alfaro, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jarvis, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alfaro, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jarvis, S. C.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Alfaro, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jarvis, S. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Dynamics of Potassium Leaching on a Hillslope Grassland Soil

Marta A. Alfaro*,a, Peter J. Gregoryb and Stephen C. Jarvisc

a National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA), Remehue Research Station, Casilla 24-O, Osorno, Chile
b The University of Reading, Department of Soil Science, Whiteknights, PO Box 233, Reading, Berks, RG6 6DW, UK
c Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (IGER), North Wyke Research Station, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 2SB, UK



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (a) Rainfall (mm d–1), (b) flow (L s–1) in overland plus subsurface lateral flow (OSF) of undrained (D–) treatments, (c) flow (L s–1) in overland plus subsurface lateral flow (OSF) and mole plus tile flow (MTF) of drained (D+) treatments and K concentration in the leachates (mg L–1) with and without nitrogen + farmyard manure (FM) fertilizer application for 2000–2001 in (d) undrained (D–) and (e) drained (D+) treatments. Arrows indicate the date of FM application.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Typical hydrographs during the declining phase in drainage from (a) undrained and (b) drained treatments with and without nitrogen application. Results are for a storm event during September 1999 (top) and February 2000 (bottom). The inserts show the corresponding linear regression for the logarithmically transformed flow data.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. An example of a fitted double exponential curve to describe the trend of changes in K concentration (mg L–1) in drainage over time (accumulated number of days with drainage) from the N+, D– treatment during 1999–2000. Day 0 represents the concentration in the background flow at the time when the drainage started.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Idealized hydrographs showing (a) overland plus subsurface lateral flow (OSF) and mole plus tile flow (MTF) and (b) simplified diagram of the trend in K concentration in drainage water with and without N + farmyard manure (FM) application. The Phase A and B sections indicate fast and slow phases of the pattern of K losses by leaching.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.