JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuntz, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Segars, W. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuntz, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Segars, W. I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kuntz, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Segars, W. I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Soil Microbiology
Right arrow Water Pollution

Targeted Sampling Protocol as Prelude to Bacterial Source Tracking with Enterococcus faecalis

Robin L. Kuntza, Peter G. Hartel*,a, Dominique G. Godfreya, Jennifer L. McDonaldb, Keith W. Gatesb and William I. Segarsa

a Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, 3111 Plant Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7272
b Marine Advisory and Technological Transfer Center, 715 Bay Street, Brunswick, GA 31520-4601



View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of the Sapelo River in Georgia.

 


View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Location of sample sites (numbers in boldface type) on the White Chimney and Sapelo Rivers showing numbers of fecal enterococci (numbers not in boldface type) from the (A) general and (B) targeted sampling on the headwaters of the Sapelo River. For the targeted sampling, the middle numbers represent sampling without local knowledge and the bottom numbers represent sampling with local knowledge. In the case of targeted sampling, only 8 of 11 samples without local knowledge and 11 of 51 samples with local knowledge are shown because the other sample locations are off of the map.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Dendrogram of restricted DNA ribotypes from 26 Enterococcus faecalis isolates obtained from humans and chickens. The restriction enzyme was PstI and the isolates are the same as those obtained by Wheeler et al. (2002).

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Flow chart of targeted sampling. For purposes of brevity, portions of the flow chart for stormflow and marine or brackish water have been deleted, but are identical to the flow chart for freshwater.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.