JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langlois, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mehuys, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langlois, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mehuys, G. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Langlois, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mehuys, G. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Surface Hydrology
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Phosphorus

Intra-Storm Study of Solute Chemical Composition of Overland Flow Water in Two Agricultural Fields

Jacques L. Langlois* and Guy R. Mehuys

Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9



View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Topographic map of both fields and location of instruments.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Design of the installation of the waterproof membrane.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Example of a hysteresis calculation based on the 3 June event for Field 1.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Hydrograph and hyetograph of each rain event. Lines with the open and closed circles are for Fields 1 and 2, respectively. The circles represent the sampling time. The lines were smoothed for a better visual presentation.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Dissolved cation concentrations and anion concentrations, plotted against the logarithm of time during the 3 June runoff event for Field 1.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Relationships between concentration of dissolved cations and anions and logarithmic values of suspended sediments in runoff during the first runoff event for Field 1.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Runoff concentrations of dissolved cations and anions over suspended sediments during a hydrological event for the first runoff event for Field 1. Note the different vertical scales for both graphs.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.