Revisiting Nitrate Concentrations in the Des Moines River
1945 and 19762001
G. F. McIsaac*,a and
R. D. Librab
a Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, W-503 Turner Hall, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
b Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey Division, Iowa City, IA 52242

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. The Des Moines River drainage basin and water quality and quantity monitoring locations used in this study.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Composite NO3N concentration as a function of average daily discharge during composite sample collection period in 1945 for the Des Moines River at Des Moines below the confluence with the Raccoon River (r = model residual from previous sample).
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Measured NO3N concentration in noncomposited samples as a function of concentrations estimated from the concentrationdischarge relationship developed from composited samples.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Annual water yield (water year basis) from the Des Moines River basin below the confluence with the Raccoon River (United States Geological Survey Station 5485500).
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Water year arithmetic average NO3N concentrations as a function of the natural logarithm of April through September water yield (mm yr-1). The open circles are the 19822001 observed annual values, with error bars representing the 95% confidence limits for individual observations based on regression analysis that incorporates autocorrelation of model residuals (r = model residual from previous year); the curved line is the expected mean value estimated from the regression analysis; the solid triangle is the expected mean at the 1945 water yield with 95% confidence limits; and the solid square is the observed 1945 value with an error bar representing the maximum estimated influence (+19%) of compositing samples over approximately 10 d.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Flow-weighted average annual NO3N concentration as a function of the natural logarithm of the April through September water yield (mm yr-1). The open circles are the observed values for the 19822001 water years, with error bars representing the 95% confidence limits for individual observations based on regression analysis that incorporates autocorrelation of model residuals (r = model residual from previous year); the curved line is the expected mean value estimated from the regression analysis; the solid triangle is the expected mean value at the 1945 water yield with 95% confidence limits; and the solid square is the 1945 value with an error bar representing the maximum estimated effect (+19%) of compositing samples over approximately 10 d.
|
|
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.