JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McIsaac, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Libra, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McIsaac, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Libra, R. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McIsaac, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Libra, R. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Fate
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Watershed-Scale Studies

Revisiting Nitrate Concentrations in the Des Moines River

1945 and 1976–2001

G. F. McIsaac*,a and R. D. Librab

a Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, W-503 Turner Hall, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
b Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey Division, Iowa City, IA 52242



View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The Des Moines River drainage basin and water quality and quantity monitoring locations used in this study.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Composite NO3–N concentration as a function of average daily discharge during composite sample collection period in 1945 for the Des Moines River at Des Moines below the confluence with the Raccoon River (r = model residual from previous sample).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Measured NO3–N concentration in noncomposited samples as a function of concentrations estimated from the concentration–discharge relationship developed from composited samples.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Annual water yield (water year basis) from the Des Moines River basin below the confluence with the Raccoon River (United States Geological Survey Station 5485500).

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Water year arithmetic average NO3–N concentrations as a function of the natural logarithm of April through September water yield (mm yr-1). The open circles are the 1982–2001 observed annual values, with error bars representing the 95% confidence limits for individual observations based on regression analysis that incorporates autocorrelation of model residuals (r = model residual from previous year); the curved line is the expected mean value estimated from the regression analysis; the solid triangle is the expected mean at the 1945 water yield with 95% confidence limits; and the solid square is the observed 1945 value with an error bar representing the maximum estimated influence (+19%) of compositing samples over approximately 10 d.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Flow-weighted average annual NO3–N concentration as a function of the natural logarithm of the April through September water yield (mm yr-1). The open circles are the observed values for the 1982–2001 water years, with error bars representing the 95% confidence limits for individual observations based on regression analysis that incorporates autocorrelation of model residuals (r = model residual from previous year); the curved line is the expected mean value estimated from the regression analysis; the solid triangle is the expected mean value at the 1945 water yield with 95% confidence limits; and the solid square is the 1945 value with an error bar representing the maximum estimated effect (+19%) of compositing samples over approximately 10 d.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.