JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Satapanajaru, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shea, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Satapanajaru, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shea, P. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Satapanajaru, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shea, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Remediation
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Soil Pollution

Enhancing Metolachlor Destruction Rates with Aluminum and Iron Salts during Zerovalent Iron Treatment

T. Satapanajarua, S. D. Comfort*,b and P. J. Sheab

a Department of Environmental Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 10900
b School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 256 Keim Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of Al and iron salts on Fe0–mediated destruction of metolachlor. Salts were added on an equal mass basis (0.5 g or 0.5% w/v) with 12.5 g unannealed Fe0 to treat 100 mL of metolachlor solution (400 mg L-1). Rate constants were obtained from first-order fitted equations.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Temporal changes in metolachlor, Al, and Fe(II) concentrations and pH following treatment with Fe0 + Al2(SO4)3 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Experimental protocol included 12.5 g Fe0, 0.5 g Al2(SO4)3, and 100 mL of metolachlor solution (400 mg L-1).

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Color changes in metolachlor–Fe0 suspensions following treatment with 5% annealed Fe0 (w/v), 1% FeSO4, and 0.5% Al2(SO4)3.

 


View larger version (121K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Scanning electron microscopy of (A) aqueous suspension and (B) iron surface following 2 h treatment of metolachlor solution (400 mg L-1) with 5% (w/v) annealed Fe0 + 1% FeSO4 + 0.5% Al2(SO4)3. Bars on photographs are scaled to approximately 1 µm.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Comparison of annealed versus unannealed iron in removing metolachlor with salt-amended iron treatments and Eh and pH changes following annealed iron treatments. SHE, standard hydrogen electrode.

 


View larger version (146K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Scanning electron microscope photos of the (A) annealed and (B) unannealed Fe0 surfaces.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Treatment of aqueous and contaminated soil slurries with 5% (w/v) Fe0 + 1% FeSO4 + 0.5% Al2(SO4)3 under constant pH. Rate constants were obtained from first-order fitted equations.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.