JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Laverdière, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Laverdière, M. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Laverdière, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Solute Transport Models
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Predicting Nitrate Leaching under Potato Crops Using Transfer Functions

M. O. Gasser*, J. Caron, R. Lagacé and M. R. Laverdière

Département des sols et de génie agroalimentaire, FSAA, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Evolution of normalized ammonium masses in soil during cropping season and fitted lognormal probability density function (pdf) of time-distributed nitrogen inputs [Nf(t)]. Planting date (P) and fertilizer sidedressing date (S) are indicated with arrows.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cumulative N mineralization patterns of four sandy soils sampled in spring following previous sod and potato crops, and incubated at three constant temperatures (4, 14, and 24°C).

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Evolution of cumulative plant N uptake during cropping season and fitted lognormal probability density function (pdf) of cumulative plant nitrogen uptake [Np(t)]. Final plant N uptake corresponds to tuber N uptake. Arrows indicate planting date (P), fertilizer sidedressing date (S), and harvest date (H).

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Measured and predicted nitrate flux concentrations in drainable lysimeters at a 1-m soil depth.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Relative bias error on predicted nitrate flux concentrations evolving at a 1-m soil depth under four potato fields (1, 2, 3, and 4) and one barley field (5) in 1996.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Measured and predicted cumulative NO3–N leaching mass flux at a 1-m soil depth under four potato fields (1, 2, 3, and 4) and one barley field (5) in 1996.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Simulated N mass fluxes under average conditions for potato production in 1996.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.