JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacinthe, P.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Gold, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacinthe, P.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Gold, A. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jacinthe, P.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Gold, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Hydrology
Right arrow Wetland Soils

Dissolved Organic Carbon Dynamics in a Riparian Aquifer

Effects of Hydrology and Nitrate Enrichment

P.-A. Jacinthe*,a, P. M. Groffmanb and A. J. Goldc

a School of Natural Resources, 2021 Coffey Road, 210 Kottman Hall, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
b Inst. of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545
c Dep. of Natural Resources Science, Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the mesocosm dosing setup.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Carbon dioxide (CO3) production in poorly drained (PD) and moderately well-drained (MWD) mesocosms as affected by soil drainage class, nitrate (NO-3), and dissolved organic C (DOC) addition. Vertical bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 6 to 27 observations).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationships between carbon dioxide (CO2) production and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in mesocosm effluent.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Degradation rate constants (d-1) of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and concentration of DOC (right scale) in extracts obtained through suspension in ground water (soil/water ratio 1:3) of forest floor materials taken from poorly drained (PD) and moderately well-drained (MWD) sections of the riparian forest. The DOC extracts were amended with NH4 (0.5 mg NH4-N L-1) and incubated aerobically in the dark for 14 d.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in the inflow and outflow of poorly drained (PD) and moderately well-drained (MWD) mesocosms. Vertical bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 6 to 27 observations).

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Sulfate (SO2-4) concentrations in the inflow and outflow of poorly drained (PD) and moderately well-drained (MWD) mesocosms. Vertical bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 6 to 27 observations).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.