JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hettiarachchi, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hettiarachchi, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, J. A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hettiarachchi, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remediation
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution

Treatment of Contaminated Soil with Phosphorus and Manganese Oxide Reduces Lead Absorption by Sprague–Dawley Rats

Ganga M. Hettiarachchi*,a,c, Gary M. Pierzynskib, Fredrick W. Oehmeb, Osman Sonmezb and James A. Ryana

a National Risk Management Research Laboratory, USEPA, Cincinnati, OH 45224
b Comparative Toxicology Laboratories, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
c Dep. of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Univ. of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Dose–response curves for blood Pb concentrations (a) for Pb acetate and untreated soil groups and (b) for soil groups. Correlations were run using data from individual animals. To reduce the number of data points on this graph, only the mean Pb concentration and dose from each group were plotted.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dose–response curves for kidney Pb concentrations (a) for Pb acetate and untreated soil groups and (b) for soil groups. Correlations were run using data from individual animals. To reduce the number of data points on this graph, only the mean Pb concentration and dose from each group were plotted.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Dose–response curves for liver Pb concentrations (a) for Pb acetate and untreated soil groups and (b) for soil groups. Correlations were run using data from individual animals. To reduce the number of data points on this graph, only the mean Pb concentration and dose from each group were plotted.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Dose–response curves for bone Pb concentrations (a) for Pb acetate and untreated soil groups and (b) for soil groups. Correlations were run using data from individual animals. To reduce the number of data points on this graph, only the mean Pb concentration and dose from each group were plotted.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Correlations between relative response (RR) or bioavailability (RBA) of Pb as determined by blood, kidney, liver, and bone dose–response curves and the bioavailability factor (BAFs) as determined from soil samples by the stomach phase of the physiologically based extraction test (PBET).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Correlations between relative response (RR) or bioavailability (RBA) of Pb as determined by blood, kidney, liver, and bone dose–response curves and bioavailability factor (BAFi) as determined from soil samples by the intestinal phase of the physiologically based extraction test (PBET).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.