JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Comfort, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Comfort, S. D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Comfort, S. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Remediation
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Nitrogen

Effects of Oxide Coating and Selected Cations on Nitrate Reduction by Iron Metal

Yong H. Huanga, Tian C. Zhang*,a, Patrick J. Sheab and Steve D. Comfortb

a Civil Engineering Dep., Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Omaha Campus, Omaha, NE 68182-0178
b School of Natural Resource Sciences, 309 Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0728



View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Results of batch tests under differing experimental conditions (defined in Table 1). (a) Test 1; (b,c) Test 2 (note that nitrate reduction occurred in three stages, TN = NH+4+ NO-3); (d) Test 4; (e) Test 12; and (f) Test 13. Values and error bars in (a), (b), and (c) represent the average and plus or minus one standard deviation, respectively, from three replicate runs.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. X-ray diffraction spectra analyses indicate that the black oxide coating and black precipitate generated from nitrate reduction by Fe0 under the anoxic condition are magnetite. (a) Commercial magnetite powder; (b) black coating on Fe0; and (c) black precipitate on filter paper.

 


View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of (a) granular Fe0 before use, bare surface (x60); (b) granular iron coated with magnetite after 20 h in the reactor with the initial conditions of Test 12 (x18k); and (c) black precipitate on a filter paper, obtained after 10 h from the reactor with the initial conditions of Test 13 (x20k).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Results of the stoichiometric test. Transforming 1 mol of NO-3–N to NH+4–N consumed 0.75 mol of aqueous Fe2+. Results are averages of duplicates.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Series of tests with various initial Fe2+ concentrations (0–3.6 mM or 0–200 mg L-1) show the stoichiometry between nitrate reduction and Fe2+ depletion in the anoxic magnetite-coated Fe0–nitrate–H2O system.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of Fe3+ or Cu2+ addition on nitrate removal. Initial conditions: 5% precoated iron + 30 mg NO-3–N L-1 + (a) 100 mg Fe3+ L-1 (FeCl3) or (b) 115 mg Cu2+ L-1 (CuCl2), without initial pH adjustment.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.