JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, L.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Contaminants
Right arrow Soil Conservation
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport
Right arrow Water Conservation

Polyacrylamide Distribution in Columns of Organic Matter–Removed Soils following Surface Application

Jianhang Lu and Laosheng Wu*

Department of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Distribution of polyacrylamide (PAM) as a function of depth in a soil column packed with (a) organic matter (OM)–removed Hanford sandy loam and (b) OM-removed Imperial silty clay. Results were obtained 48 h after the 8-cm ponded application (40 mg L-1 PAM solution).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Distribution of polyacrylamide (PAM) with soil depth under different application concentrations of PAM. Results were obtained 48 h after the 8-cm ponded application. The soil was the organic matter (OM)–removed Hanford sandy loam and the salt level was 0.001 M CaCl2.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Polyacrylamide (PAM) sorption isotherms on the two organic matter (OM)–removed soils under various salt concentrations. Each data point is the mean of two replicates and the solid line is the fitted Langmuir sorption isotherm.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Distribution of polyacrylamide (PAM) as a function of depth in a soil column packed with the organic matter (OM)–removed Hanford sandy loam. Results were obtained 48 h after the 8-cm drip application (40 mg L-1 PAM solution).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The effects of initial soil water content on the distribution of polyacrylamide (PAM) with soil depth. Results were obtained 48 h after the 8-cm ponded application (40 mg L-1 PAM solution). The soil was the organic matter (OM)–removed Hanford sandy loam and the salt level in the applied PAM solution was 0.001 M CaCl2.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.