JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Childers, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Scinto, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Childers, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Scinto, L. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Childers, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Scinto, L. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Decadal Change in Vegetation and Soil Phosphorus Pattern across the Everglades Landscape

Daniel L. Childers*,a, Robert F. Dorenc, Ronald Jonesa, Gregory B. Noeb, Michael Ruggeb and Leonard J. Scintob

a Dep. of Biological Sciences, Florida International Univ., Miami, FL 33199
b Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International Univ., Miami, FL 33199
c South Florida Ecosystems Restoration Task Force, Department of the Interior, Miami, FL 33199



View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Map of southern Florida and the Everglades showing the location of the transects. (B) schematic of the sampling scheme used for macrophyte and soil sampling in 1989 (see Doren et al., 1997) and 1999.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Macrophyte and soils data from the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge transect. (A) Total aboveground standing live biomass; (B) total aboveground standing dead biomass; (C) tissue phosphorus content of the dominant species (sawgrass, spikerush, or cattail); (D) soil phosphorus (curve fit for the 0- to 29-km sites: C = 288 + 695e(-0.52d), r2 = 0.79, p < 0.001).

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Dendrogram of plant community groupings for all transects based on Sorensen's distance similarity with analysis of variance (ANOVA) post-hoc test results for soil P similarity shown in parentheses (same letters indicate no significant difference in soil P). (A) Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge (soil P results: Group 1 A, Group 2 B, Group 3 C, Group 4 BC); (B) Water Conservation Area (WCA) 2A (soil P results: Group 1 A, Group 2 AC, Group 3 BC); (C) WCA-3A (soil P results: Group 1 A, Group 2 B, Group 4 B, none for Group 3); (D) Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park (soil P results: Group 2 A, Group 3 A, none for Group 1); (E) Taylor Slough, Everglades National Park.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Macrophyte and soils data from the Water Conservation Area (WCA) 2A transect. (A) Total aboveground standing live biomass; (B) total aboveground standing dead biomass; (C) tissue phosphorus content of the dominant species (sawgrass, spikerush, or cattail); (D) soil phosphorus (curve fit for the 4- to 14-km sites: C = 417 + 889e(-1.74d), r2 = 0.89, p < 0.10).

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Macrophyte and soils data from the Water Conservation Area (WCA) 3A transect. (A) Total aboveground standing live biomass; (B) total aboveground standing dead biomass; (C) tissue phosphorus content of the dominant species (sawgrass, spikerush, or cattail); (D) soil phosphorus (transect mean = 361 ± 61 mg kg-1, range = 260–479 mg kg-1 excluding the 0-km cattail site).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Macrophyte and soils data from the Shark River Slough (Everglades National Park) transect. (A) Total aboveground standing live biomass; (B) total aboveground standing dead biomass; (C) tissue phosphorus content of the dominant species (sawgrass, spikerush, or cattail); (D) soil phosphorus (curve fit: C = 210 + 746e(-1.65d), r2 = 0.82, p < 0.001).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Macrophyte and soils data from the Taylor Slough (Everglades National Park) transect. (A) Total aboveground standing live biomass; (B) total aboveground standing dead biomass; (C) tissue phosphorus content of the dominant species (sawgrass, spikerush, or cattail); (D) soil phosphorus (transect mean = 131 ± 16 mg kg-1, range = 109–151 mg kg-1 excluding both 4-km marl soil sites).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Comparison of plant biodiversity from 1989 to 1999 by transect for the Loxahatchee, Water Conservation Area (WCA) 2A, WCA-3A, and Shark River Slough transects, including total numbers of native species versus exotic species from both samplings.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.