HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wulf, S. Articles by Clemens, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wulf, S. Articles by Clemens, J. Agricola Articles by Wulf, S. Articles by Clemens, J. Related Collections Ecological Risk Assessment Air Pollution Animal Waste

Application Technique and Slurry Co-Fermentation Effects on Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane Emissions after Spreading

II. Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Institute of Plant Nutrition, University of Bonn, Karlrobert-Kreiten-Str. 13, 53115 Bonn, Germany

View larger version (35K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Methane emission rates after spreading co-fermented slurry with different application techniques on arable (a) and grassland (b) sites. Data represent means and standard deviation (n = 4).

View larger version (46K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Cumulated CH4 emission after spreading co-fermented slurry with different application techniques on arable (a) and grassland (b) sites. Data represent means and standard deviation (n = 4).

View larger version (37K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Cumulated CH4 emission after trail hose application of co-fermented slurry and unfermented cattle slurry on arable (a) and grassland (b) sites. Data represent means and standard deviation (n = 4).

View larger version (39K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Nitrous oxide emission rate and meteorological data after spreading co-fermented slurry with different application techniques on grassland. (a) Whole experimental period. (b) First week of the experiment. Data represent means and standard deviation for emission rates (n = 4).

View larger version (30K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Nitrous oxide emission rate and meteorological data after spreading co-fermented slurry with different application techniques on arable land. Data represent means and standard deviation for emission rates (n = 4).

View larger version (36K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Cumulated N2O emission after spreading co-fermented slurry with different application techniques on arable (a) and grassland (b) sites. Data represent means and standard deviation (n = 4).

View larger version (32K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Cumulated N2O emission after trail hose application of co-fermented slurry and unfermented cattle slurry on arable (a) and grassland (b) sites. Data represent means and standard deviation (n = 4).

View larger version (38K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Climatic warming potential of the different application techniques for co-fermented slurry and trail hose–applied unfermented slurry expressed as CO2 equivalents calculated from the emission of the single trace gases. Data represent means and standard deviation (n = 4).