JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spruill, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Howe, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spruill, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Howe, S. S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Spruill, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Howe, S. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Statistics
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

Application of Classification-Tree Methods to Identify Nitrate Sources in Ground Water

Timothy B. Spruill*,a, William J. Showersb and Stephen S. Howea

a United States Geological Survey, 3916 Sunset Ridge Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607
b Dep. of Marine Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8208



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Locations of sites sampled in North Carolina and nitrate contamination sources.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Diagram of hypothetical classification tree showing node types, split variables, and associated split values.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Classification tree for Model 1 using the predictor variables potassium plus {delta}15N of nitrate (KNO315), nitrate to ammonia ratio (NO3NH4), sodium to potassium ratio (NAK), and dissolved zinc (ZN), in micrograms per liter.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Classification tree for Model 2 using the predictor variables sum of sodium plus potassium (NAKSUM), nitrate to ammonia ratio (NO3NH4), calcium to magnesium ratio (CMR), and sodium to potassium ratio (NAK).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Distributions of (A) N15 ({delta}15N in per mil) and (B) potassium (mg/L) plus {delta}15N of nitrate ({per thousand}) (KNO315) in five source categories demonstrating the effect of adding potassium to increase separation of the animal and fertilizer groups and particularly the Poultry and Septic categories.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Distributions of (A) NA (sodium, in milligrams per liter) and (B) NAK (sodium to potassium ratio, unitless) in five source categories showing increase of separation between septic and the other two animal source categories when NAK is used.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.