JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schilling, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schilling, K. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schilling, K. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Water Pollution

Chemical Transport from Paired Agricultural and Restored Prairie Watersheds

Keith E. Schilling*

Iowa Dep. of Natural Resources, Geological Survey Bureau, 109 Trowbridge Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242-1319



View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of watersheds, stream gauging sites, and areas of prairie plantings and farm management units managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Example of hydrograph separation for Water Year 1999 at the lower portion of the Walnut Creek watershed (WNT2). The enlarged area shows hydrograph separation and dates of stream sample collection.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Comparison of flow-weighted concentrations estimated with the ESTIMATOR program with actual concentration data for entire data set and baseflow data set. Data for Squaw Creek watershed only is shown; data for Walnut Creek were very similar and are available upon request.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Percentage of total flow and loads of NO3–N, Cl, and SO4 from baseflow inputs by water year. SQW2, Squaw Creek watershed outlet; WNT1, upper portion of the Walnut Creek watershed; WNT2, lower portion of the Walnut Creek watershed.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Monthly mean discharge and baseflow discharge, and total and baseflow monthly loads of NO3–N, Cl, and SO4 measured at the lower portion of the Walnut Creek watershed (WNT2) and the Squaw Creek watershed outlet (SQW2).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Percentage of total flow and loads of NO3–N, Cl, and SO4 from baseflow inputs by month at the lower portion of the Walnut Creek watershed (WNT2) and the Squaw Creek watershed outlet (SQW2).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.