JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKay, L.D.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, G.V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKay, L.D.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, G.V.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McKay, L.D.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, G.V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ground Water Quality
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Water Pollution

Influence of Flow Rate on Transport of Bacteriophage in Shale Saprolite

L.D. McKay*,a, A.D. Hartonb and G.V. Wilsonc

a Dep. of Geological Sciences, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1410
b Lexington, VA (formerly UT-Knoxville)
c USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Lab., 598 McElroy Dr., Oxford, MS 38655



View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Photograph of the end of the saprolite column showing bedding planes (vertical in the photograph) and fractures cutting across the bedding. (B) Schematic diagram of the column setup used for the miscible displacement experiments.

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Influence of flow rate on transport of bacteriophage in shale saprolite: (A) 0.0075 m d-1, (B) 0.039 m d-1, (C) 0.19 m d-1, and (D) 0.96 m d-1.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Influence of change in flow rate on effluent concentrations during flush between Experiments 1 and 4.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Recovery of tracers as a function of flow rate. Open symbols represent percent recovery calculated based on measured concentrations in effluent. Closed symbols represent calculations that include a correction for inactivation of PRD-1 and MS-2 in the column.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.