JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khalil, M.I.
Right arrow Articles by Shamshuddin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khalil, M.I.
Right arrow Articles by Shamshuddin, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Khalil, M.I.
Right arrow Articles by Shamshuddin, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tropical Soil Management
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Air Pollution
Right arrow Nitrogen

Nitrous Oxide Emissions from an Ultisol of the Humid Tropics under Maize–Groundnut Rotation

M.I. Khalil*,a, A.B. Rosenanib, O. Van Cleemputc, C.I. Fauziahb and J. Shamshuddinb

a Soil Science Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Mymensingh 2200, Bangladesh
b Dep. Land Management, Univ. Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor D.E., Malaysia
c Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, Ghent Univ., Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium



View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Daily minimum and maximum air temperature and rainfall during the groundnut–fallow–maize–fallow period (Day 1 corresponds to 19 November 1998).

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Changes in the N2O flux, soil mineral N, and water-filled pore space (WFPS) with time during the groundnut–fallow–maize–fallow period as influenced by different amounts and sources of nitrogen. (A) N2O flux, (B) NH+4–N, (C) NO-3–N, and (D) WFPS (NC = recommended N + crop residue, RN = recommended N only and NCM = half of the recommended N + crop residue + chicken manure). Day 1 corresponds to 19 Nov. 1998. Arrows indicate the day of management practices as in Fig. 2A.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Total N2O fluxes as influenced by the different amounts and sources of nitrogen during groundnut–fallow–maize–fallow periods (NC = recommended N + crop residue, RN = recommended N only and NCM = half of the recommended N + crop residue + chicken manure). The bar(s) having common letter(s) do not differ significantly at the 5% level of Duncan's Multiple Range Test.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.