JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verstraeten, G.
Right arrow Articles by Poesen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verstraeten, G.
Right arrow Articles by Poesen, J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Verstraeten, G.
Right arrow Articles by Poesen, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Soil Erosion
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Spatial Distribution

Regional Scale Variability in Sediment and Nutrient Delivery from Small Agricultural Watersheds

Gert Verstraeten*,a,b and Jean Poesena

a Laboratory for Experimental Geomorphology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Redingenstraat 16, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
b Postdoctoral Fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research—Flanders



View larger version (93K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sediment core taken in the Ciplet retention pond showing four sedimentary events (total length = 14.9 cm).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relation between total phosphorus (TP) and the fine sediment fraction (<16 µm) for all analyzed sediment samples taken in 13 retention ponds.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Variation of sediment texture and sediment-associated nutrient content with depth for one of the sediment cores taken in the Ciplet retention pond (see also Fig. 1).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between total phosphorus (TP) content and sediment texture both for detailed samples taken in the Ciplet retention pond and for bulk samples covering the total sediment depth.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Annual variation of sediment (STE) and sediment-associated nutrient trap efficiency (NTE) for the Hammeveld retention pond as simulated with the STEP model.

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Spatial distribution of P2O5 production and application on agricultural land within Flanders. (a) The total P2O5 application rate without taking into account P2O5 redistribution, (b) the local animal P2O5 production, and (c) the actual P2O5 application rate taking into account P2O5 redistribution. Units of P2O5 application and production rates are expressed in kg P2O5 ha-1 agricultural land (includes cropland and grassland) (Vlaamse Landmaatschappij, 2001). The location of the studied retention ponds is indicated with a *.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.