JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rennert, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mansfeldt, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rennert, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mansfeldt, T.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rennert, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mansfeldt, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Sorption of Iron–Cyanide Complexes on Goethite in the Presence of Sulfate and Desorption with Phosphate and Chloride

Thilo Rennert and Tim Mansfeldt*

Arbeitsgruppe Bodenkunde und Bodenökologie, Fakultät für Geowissenschaften, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany



View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sorption of iron–cyanide complexes on goethite in the presence and absence of equimolar amounts of sulfate and sorption of sulfate in the presence of iron–cyanide complexes as influenced by pH (a, ferricyanide; b, ferrocyanide). Initial concentration of each anion was 0.3 mmol L-1.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Sorption of iron–cyanide complexes and sulfate on goethite at variable iron–cyanide complex and constant sulfate concentrations at pH 3.5 (a, ferricyanide; b, ferrocyanide). Experimental conditions: ci ([Fe(CN)6]) = 0.025 to 0.48 mmol L-1; ci = 0.23 mmol L-1; I = 0.01 M. Regression equations for sorption data: ferricyanide, S = 20.5 - 19.8 exp; ferrocyanide, S = 22.2 - 24.1 exp; sulfate (presence of ferricyanide), S = 15 + 7.91 exp; sulfate (presence of ferrocyanide), S = 7.99 + 21.9 exp.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Sorption of iron–cyanide complexes and sulfate on goethite at variable sulfate and constant iron–cyanide complex concentrations at pH 3.5 (a, ferricyanide; b, ferrocyanide). Experimental conditions: ci = 0.05 to 0.9 mmol L-1; ci = 0.24 mmol L-1; I = 0.01 M. Regression equations for sorption data: ferricyanide, S = 18.5 - 18.3 exp; ferrocyanide, S = 17.5 - 1.5 exp; sulfate (presence of ferricyanide), S = 6.9 + 6.32 exp; sulfate (presence of ferrocyanide), S = 3.39 - 4.72 exp.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Desorption of iron–cyanide complexes by chloride solutions (0.04 to 1 M NaCl) at three initial pH values.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Desorption of iron–cyanide complexes by phosphate solutions (0.2 to 1.5 mM Na2HPO4) at three initial pH values.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Desorption of ferrocyanide by pH-adjusted phosphate solutions (0.24 to 15 mM Na2HPO4) at two initial pH values.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.