JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haney, R.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haney, R.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Haney, R.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Soil Biochemistry

Effect of Roundup Ultra on Microbial Activity and Biomass from Selected Soils

R.L. Haney, S.A. Senseman* and F.M. Hons

Department of Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2474



View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Carbon dioxide evolution from soil after applications of Roundup Ultra (product; applied at 3 x field rate) and analytical-grade glyphosate, and a control.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of Roundup Ultra on daily carbon mineralization between 1 and 7 d from different soils with (A) 0.2 to 0.5% organic C, (B) 0.6 to 0.8% organic C, and (C) 0.9 to 2.6% organic C. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of Roundup Ultra on cumulative carbon mineralization between 1 and 7 d from nine soils with (A) 0.2 to 0.5% organic C, (B) 0.6 to 0.8% organic C, and (C) 0.9 to 2.6% organic C. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil microbial biomass (A) carbon (SMBC) and (B) nitrogen (SMBN) with and without Roundup Ultra addition. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mineralization for (A) carbon and (B) nitrogen, after 50 d of incubation for nine soils. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Regression analysis for (A) soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) vs. soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) with and without Roundup Ultra addition and (B) N mineralized vs. C mineralized in 50 d with and without Roundup Ultra addition.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Regression analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) determined at 14 d with (A) SMBC vs. 7-d C mineralization and (B) SMBC vs. 14-d C mineralization.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.