JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Addy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Addy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, C.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Addy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Wetland Soils
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

In Situ Push–Pull Method to Determine Ground Water Denitrification in Riparian Zones

Kelly Addya, D. Q. Kellogga, Arthur J. Gold*,a, Peter M. Groffmanb, Gina Ferendoa and Carl Sawyerb

a Dep. of Natural Resources Science, Coastal Institute in Kingston, Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881
b Dep. of Plant Sciences, Woodward Hall, Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881



View larger version (85K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic of the in situ push–pull mini-piezometer method.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relative concentration profiles of SF6 from the 72- and 120-h conservative tracer push–pull pretests at Site A. The term C represents the concentration of the sample pulled from the mini-piezometer. The term Co represents the concentration of the dosing solution originally pushed into the mini-piezometer.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relative concentration profiles of conservative tracers (SF6 and Br-) from the 72-h in situ nitrate push–pull test in one Site A mini-piezometer. The term C represents the concentration of the sample pulled from the mini-piezometer. The term Co represents the concentration of the dosing solution originally pushed into the mini-piezometer.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Ground water denitrification rates from the in situ nitrate push–pull test conducted at Site A. Values for mesocosm data are the mean (SE) of three replicate mesocosms (Addy et al., 1999) and values for push–pull data are the mean (SE) of three replicate mini-piezometers.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Ground water denitrification rates from the in situ nitrate push–pull test conducted at Site B. Values are the mean (SE) of four marsh and three fringe mini-piezometers.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.