JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matisoff, G.
Right arrow Articles by Whiting, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matisoff, G.
Right arrow Articles by Whiting, P. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matisoff, G.
Right arrow Articles by Whiting, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Conservation
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Soil Erosion

Radionuclides as Indicators of Sediment Transport in Agricultural Watersheds that Drain to Lake Erie

Gerald Matisoff*, Everett C. Bonniwell and Peter J. Whiting

Department of Geological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sample collection locations in the Rock Creek (RC) watershed. Storm runoff was sampled at 12 locations (Sites A-3 though A-11, TA-2, and B-1 through B-3) in the watershed. The A stations were located along the main drainage channel, and TA-2 was located on a tributary to the main channel that enters the creek just downstream from A-11. The B stations were located on the main channel downstream of tributary TA-2.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Runoff hydrographs at Old Woman Creek (OWC). The top figure (A) illustrates the difference between the hydrographs at Site C (tilled) and Site F (no-till), which are located in similar subbasin positions in the watershed. The lower figure (B) illustrates the progression in time of the hydrograph as the kinematic wave translates downstream 10 km from Site C to Site G.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Sedigraphs and hydrographs for sites in the Rock Creek (RC) watershed. The scale for discharge at Station A-11 is three times larger than at the other stations.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Sedigraphs and hydrographs at Sites C and F in the Old Woman Creek (OWC) watershed.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The 210Pb (A) and 7Be (B) activities in the suspended sediment as a function of suspended sediment concentrations.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The 210Pb and 7Be activities in suspended sediments from Rock Creek (RC) and from conventionally tilled and no-till subbasins at Old Woman Creek (OWC).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Suspended sediment concentrations along the length of Old Woman Creek (OWC) during and after the rainfall event.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. The radionuclide signature of the sediment slug (identified in Fig. 7) as it moved downstream.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Exponential decrease of 7Be in suspended sediments at various times after passage of the sediment slug and the transport distances calculated from Eq. [3].

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Probability distributions of suspended sediment transport distance at Sites B, C, D, and G.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.