JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laabs, V.
Right arrow Articles by Zech, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laabs, V.
Right arrow Articles by Zech, W.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Laabs, V.
Right arrow Articles by Zech, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides

Fate of Pesticides in Tropical Soils of Brazil under Field Conditions

V. Laabs*,a, W. Amelunga, A. Pintob and W. Zecha

a Inst. of Soil Science and Soil Geography, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
b Projeto Ecologia do Gran Pantanal, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, 78060 Cuiabá, MT, Brazil



View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the wick lysimeter.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dissipation of metolachlor in topsoil (0–8 cm) of Ustox and Psamments soils (error bars denote standard errors, n = 3).

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Leaching of pesticides in the soil profile in percent of the applied amount (error bars denote standard errors, n = 3).

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between water solubility and the portion of pesticide (in percent of the applied amount) leached beyond 10 cm soil depth at 14 d after application (AC, alachlor; AZ, atrazine; ES, endosulfan {alpha}; MC, metolachlor; SZ, simazine; TN, trifluralin).

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mean precipitation (n = 6) and cumulative amount of percolate in free-draining lysimeters on Ustox and Psamments soils (35 cm soil depth, n = 3), error bars denote standard errors.

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Cumulative leaching and concentrations of pesticides in lysimeter percolate of free-draining lysimeters (35 cm soil depth), error bars denote standard errors (n = 3).

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Relationship between the mean pesticide concentrations in free-draining lysimeters (35 cm soil depth) and the Groundwater Ubiquity Score (GUS = log(t0.5)[4 - log(KOC)]), according to Gustafson (1989) (AC, alachlor; AZ, atrazine; CF, chlorpyrifos; ES, endosulfan {alpha}; MC, metolachlor; MF, monocrotofos; SZ, simazine; TN, trifluralin); p < 0.05 for both regressions.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.