JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, M.K.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, H.C.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, M.K.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, H.C.B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, M.K.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, H.C.B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation

Adsorption of Cadmium, Copper, Nickel, and Zinc to a Poly(tetrafluorethene) Porous Soil Solution Sampler

M.K. Andersen*,a, K. Raulund-Rasmussenb, B.W. Strobela and H.C.B. Hansena

a Chemistry Department, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
b Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Hoersholm Kongevej 11, 2970 Hoersholm, Denmark



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The experimental setup. The different influent solutions are pumped through the suction cup and the effluent samples are collected using a fraction collector.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Concentrations (C) of Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn in the cleansing effluent solution as a function of accumulated volume of 0.01 M HNO3 solution pumped through the cup.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The concentrations of Cd, Ni, Zn, and Cu in the influent and the effluent solutions as a function of the cumulative volume of effluent studied for different influent electrolytes. The influent pH was 4.5 throughout the entire experiment. The concentrations of metals in the influent solution were designed to vary sequentially between a low level of 10 µg L-1 in Period 1, a high level of 30 µg L-1 in Period 2, and a low level of 10 µg L-1 in Period 3. When no background electrolyte was used a final zero-level of metal (0 µg L-1) was added as Period 4. The standard errors of means for the no-electrolyte, 0.01 M NaCl, and 0.01 M CaCl2 experiments are 0.30, 0.66, and 0.55 for Cd, 0.60, 0.79, and 0.87 for Ni, 0.73, 0.86, and 0.77 for Zn, and 0.86, 0.73, and 1.03 for Cu, respectively. Samples points below detection limits are not shown.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.