Soil Phosphorus Variability in Pastures
Implications for Sampling and Environmental Management Strategies
Michael B. Daniels*,a,
Paul Delauneb,
Phillip A. Moore, Jr.c,
Andy Mauromoustakosd,
Stan L. Chapmana and
John M. Langstona
a Univ. of Arkansas Coop. Ext. Service, 2301 S. University Ave., Little Rock, AR 72203
b Dep. of Crops, Soils, and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
c Jr. USDA-ARS, Poultry Production & Product Safety Research Unit, Fayetteville AR, 72701
d Agricultural Statistics Lab., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. The probability of obtaining an estimate within the 95% confidence interval of the mean soil P as a function of number of subsamples.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Minimum number of subsamples required in a zig-zag pattern to obtain an estimate of soil P with >0.9 level of probability within 10 and 20% of the measured mean, within the 95% confidence interval of the measured mean, and within 15 mg kg-1 soil P for pastures with less than 30 samples taken.
|
|

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Minimum number of subsamples required in a zig-zag pattern to obtain an estimate of soil P with >0.9 level of probability within 10 and 20% of the measured mean, within the 95% confidence interval of the measured mean, and within 15 mg kg-1 soil P for pastures with greater than 96 samples taken.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Relationship of probability of obtaining an estimate that exceeds 150 mg kg-1 and the number of subsamples in pasture RV1.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Relationship of percentage of pasture <150 mg kg-1 to mean soil phosphorus (P) for 12 Arkansas pastures.
|
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.