JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Munster, C.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Munster, C.L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Munster, C.L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Plant Contamination by Organic Pollutants in Phytoremediation

Kijune Sunga, M.Yavuz Corapcioglu*,a, M.C. Drewb and C.L. Munsterc

a Dep. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3136
b Dep. of Horticultural Science, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2133
c Dep. of Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2117



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic of the plant contamination model. (a) Components of the two-compartment plant model. (b) Linkage of the two-compartment plant model to the soil model.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Temporal variation of (a) contaminat concentration in the root compartment, (b) contaminant concentration in shoot compartment, and (c) total mass of root and shoot.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The effect of the first-order sorption kinetic rate coefficient {alpha}s for TNT concentration in (a) root compartment and (b) shoot compartment.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The effect of the soil organic carbon content foc on TNT concentration in (a) root compartment and (b) shoot compartment, and (c) the effect of the mass transfer rate coefficient between soil and root Knrw on TNT concentration in the root compartment.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. TNT degradation in the plant for various values of (a) the first-order degradation rate coefficient in the root compartment, Krc, and (b) the first-order degradation rate coefficient in shoot compartment Khc.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The effect of the microbial biomass concentration on TNT concentration in (a) root compartment and (b) shoot compartment, and (c) the temporal variation of microbial concentration.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The effect of the additional substrate concentration, CI0, on TNT concentration in (a) root compartment and (b) shoot compartment, and (c) the temporal variation of microbial concentration.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. The effect of the maximum specific growth rate, µmax, on TNT concentration in (a) root compartment and (b) shoot compartment.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.