JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (53)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Ecosystem Restoration
Right arrow Soil Erosion
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Water Pollution

Assessing Site Vulnerability to Phosphorus Loss in an Agricultural Watershed

Andrew N. Sharpley*, Richard W. McDowell, Jennifer L. Weld and Peter J. A. Kleinman

USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Laboratory, Building 3702, Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802-3702



View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The FD-36 watershed, soil type distribution, and field boundaries.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The FD-36 field boundaries and identification numbers.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Plan of the portable rainfall simulator, showing paired 1- by 2-m surface runoff plots, and water collection system. The nozzle is situated approximately 245 cm above the plots.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between the concentration of dissolved and total P in surface runoff and Mehlich-3 extractable soil P concentration for sites in fields where no P had been applied within the last six months and where fertilizer or manure had been applied within three weeks of rainfall in FD-36 watershed. Regression equations and corresponding coefficients apply only to plots not having received P in the last six months.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Relationship between the concentration of dissolved and total P in surface runoff and the P index rating for sites in fields where no P had been applied within the last six months and where fertilizer or manure had been applied within three weeks of rainfall in FD-36 watershed.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Relationship between the loss of dissolved and total P in surface runoff and the P index rating for sites in fields where no P had been applied within the last six months and where fertilizer or manure had been applied within three weeks of rainfall in FD-36 watershed.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.