JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birr, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mulla, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birr, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mulla, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Birr, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mulla, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Water Pollution

Evaluation of the Phosphorus Index in Watersheds at the Regional Scale

A. S. Birr and D. J. Mulla*

Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108



View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. River basins of Minnesota within the study area.

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Total P monitoring data collected in Minnesota summarized by watershed. (a) Percentage of samples exceeding 0.25 mg/L total P collected from streams. (b) Median total P concentrations (µg/L) collected from lakes.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Modified P Index transport site characteristics included in the modified P Index for watersheds of Minnesota. (a) Potential soil erosion losses (Mg/ha). (b) Observed runoff values interpolated from 327 United States Geological Survey (USGS) long-term gauging stations (cm/yr). (c) Cropland and pastureland area within 91.4 m of drainage ditches and perennial streams normalized by the watershed area.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Modified P index source factors for watersheds of Minnesota. (a) Bray-1 extractable P levels (mg P/kg). (b) Fertilizer P application rate normalized by reported total fertilized land (kg P/ha). (c) Organic P application rate normalized by reported total cropland (kg P/ha).

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Modified P Index ratings for watersheds of Minnesota.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Relationship between water quality data and modified P Index rating for selected watersheds of Minnesota. (a) Relationship between modified P Index rating and percentage of samples exceeding 0.25 mg/L total P for watersheds within the Upper Mississippi River, Lower Mississippi River, Minnesota River, St. Croix River, and Cedar River Basins. (b) Relationship between modified P Index rating and median total P concentrations of lakes. (c) Relationship between modified P Index rating and percentage of samples exceeding 0.25 mg/L total P for watersheds within the Red River Basin.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.