JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hapeman, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rice, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hapeman, C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rice, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hapeman, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Sustainable Agriculture
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Soil Erosion
Right arrow Water Pollution

Runoff Loss of Pesticides and Soil

A Comparison between Vegetative Mulch and Plastic Mulch in Vegetable Production Systems

Pamela J. Rice*,a, Laura L. McConnellb, Lynne P. Heightonb, Ali M. Sadeghib, Allan R. Isensee{dagger},b, John R. Teasdaleb, Aref A. Abdul-Bakib, Jennifer A. Harman-Fetchob and Cathleen J. Hapeman*,b

a USDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108
b Sustainable Agricultural Systems Lab., USDA-ARS, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Precipitation and runoff volume from polyethylene and hairy vetch mulch plots during the 3-yr study. The difference in runoff volume at each runoff event is significant (p <= 0.05) with the exception of runoff events 1997-210, 1998-201, and 1999-184. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the means.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Quantity of soil lost with runoff from polyethylene and hairy vetch mulch plots during the 3-yr study. The difference in soil loss at each runoff event is significant (p <= 0.05) with the exception of runoff events 1997-210, 1998-201, and 1998-251. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the means.

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Dissolved- and particle-phase loads of chlorothalonil in runoff following the application of Bravo 720 (a.i. chlorothalonil, 30.81 g per 162 m2 plot). Asterisk(s) represent a significant difference (* for p = 0.05, ** for p = 0.01) in pesticide load between mulch treatments for that runoff event. Numbers in parentheses represent days between application and runoff. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the means.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Dissolved- and particle-phase loads of {alpha}-endosulfan in runoff following the application of Thiodan 50 WP (a.i. endosulfan, 9.08 g per 162 m2 plot). Asterisk(s) represent a significant difference (* for p = 0.05, ** for p = 0.01) in pesticide load between mulch treatments for that runoff event. Numbers in parentheses represent days between application and runoff. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the means.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Dissolved- and particle-phase loads of ß-endosulfan in runoff following the application of Thiodan 50 WP (a.i. endosulfan, 9.08 g per 162 m2 plot). Asterisk(s) represent a significant difference (* for p = 0.05, ** for p = 0.01) in pesticide load between mulch treatments for that runoff event. Numbers in parentheses represent days between application and runoff. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the means.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Dissolved- and particle-phase loads of metribuzin in runoff following the application of Lexone DF (a.i. metribuzin, 6.81 g per 162 m2 plot). Asterisks represent a significant difference (p = 0.01) in pesticide load between mulch treatments for that runoff event. Numbers in parentheses represent days between application and runoff. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the means.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Particle-phase loads of esfenvalerate in runoff following the application of Asana XL (a.i. esfenvalerate, 0.44 g per 162 m2 plot). Asterisks represent a significant difference (p = 0.01) in pesticide load between mulch treatments for that runoff event. Numbers in parentheses represent days between application and runoff. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the means. BQL = below quantification limits.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Dissolved-phase loading of chlorothalonil, {alpha}-endosulfan, and ß-endosulfan with time. The runoff event occurred in 1998 on Day of Year 244, which was 4 d following the application of chlorothalonil and endosulfan.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.