JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pierson, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by West, L. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pierson, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by West, L. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pierson, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by West, L. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Water Pollution

Phosphorus and Ammonium Concentrations in Surface Runoff from Grasslands Fertilized with Broiler Litter

S. T. Piersona, M. L. Cabrera*,b, G. K. Evanyloa, H. A. Kuykendall, C. S. Hovelandb, M. A. McCannc and L. T. Westb

a Dep. of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
b Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
c Animal and Dairy Sciences, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Average runoff volume and flow-weighted NH+4–N and DRP concentrations in individual runoff events from grasslands fertilized with broiler litter (down arrows indicate broiler litter applications; up arrows indicate N fertilizer applications; error bars indicate standard deviations based on six paddocks).

 


View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Flow-weighted concentration of DRP as a function of natural logarithm of days after litter application and natural logarithm of runoff volume.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Observed versus fitted DRP concentration in runoff. The diagonal line corresponds to a 1:1 relationship. The fitted model for DRP consisted of linear regression terms for ln DAA, ln RUNOFF, and the interaction between both variables.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil test P (Mehlich 1; 0- to 15-cm line) and flow-weighted concentration of DRP (bars) between soil samplings (error bars indicate standard deviation; down arrows indicate broiler litter applications).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.