JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M.-H.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M.-H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ground Water Quality
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Water Pollution

Statistical Evaluation of Geochemical Parameter Distribution in a Ground Water System Contaminated with Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Jin-Yong Leea, Jeong-Yong Cheonb, Kang-Kun Lee*,b, Seok-Young Leec and Min-Hyo Leec

a GeoGreen 21 Co., Ltd., Research Park Innovation Center 412, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-818, Korea
b School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National Univ., Seoul 151-742, Korea
c Soil Environment Division, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon City, Korea



View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of the study site, and the layout of the monitoring wells and the piezometers. The location of the petroleum hydrocarbon storage tanks is also shown.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Hydrogeologic section showing vertical well locations and screen intervals. Locations of the wells are not aligned in the straight line.

 


View larger version (54K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Ground water level contours for (a) May 1999 and (b) September 1999. Numbers indicate ground water levels above mean sea level in meters.

 


View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Distribution of total toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (TEX) concentrations in ground water for (a) May 1999 and (b) September 1999. Units are mg/L.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Changes in the geochemical parameters between May and September 1999 at monitoring wells along the main direction of ground water flow.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Piper plots showing major chemical compositions of the ground waters for (a) May and (b) September 1999.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Plot of alkalinity versus calcium with 1:1 alkalinity–Ca line (dotted).

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Areal distribution of factor scores for Factor 1 for May.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Dendrograms formed using factor scores for (a) May 1999 and (b) September 1999.

 


View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Results of the clustering for (a) May and (b) September 1999.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.