HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stewart, B.R. Articles by Jackson, M.L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stewart, B.R. Articles by Jackson, M.L. Agricola Articles by Stewart, B.R. Articles by Jackson, M.L. Related Collections Industrial Waste Water Quality Water Pollution

Evaluation of Leachates from Coal Refuse Blended with Fly Ash at Different Rates

^a Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
^b Dep. of Crop and Soil Environ. Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061-0404
^c Dep. of Forestry, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061-0138

View larger version (41K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Chronologic mean (n = 3) column leachate pH values for each treatment. Each week 2.5 cm of simulated acid rain was applied to each column. Error bars reflect 1 sample SD above and below the mean.

View larger version (40K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Chronologic mean (n = 3) column leachate EC values for each treatment. Each week 2.5 cm of simulated acid rain was applied to each column. Error bars reflect 1 sample SD above and below the mean.

View larger version (23K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Variation in treatment mean (n = 3) leachate Fe content with time. Each week 2.5 cm of simulated acid rain was applied to each column. Error bars reflect 1 sample SD above and below the mean.

View larger version (40K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Mean (n = 3) total Fe (left axis) and Mn (right axis) for the WVF treatments and Control.

View larger version (19K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Variation in treatment mean (n = 3) leachate Mn content with time. Each week 2.5 cm of simulated acid rain was applied to each column. Error bars reflect 1 sample SD above and below the mean.

View larger version (21K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Variation in treatment mean (n = 3) leachate Cu content with time. Each week 2.5 cm of simulated acid rain was applied to each column. Error bars reflect 1 sample SD above and below the mean.

View larger version (23K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Variation in treatment mean (n = 3) leachate B content with time. Each week 2.5 cm of simulated acid rain was applied to each column. Error bars reflect 1 sample SD above and below the mean.