JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shiowatana, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nacapricha, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shiowatana, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nacapricha, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shiowatana, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nacapricha, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Soil Analysis

A Novel Continuous-Flow Sequential Extraction Procedure for Metal Speciation in Solids

J. Shiowatana*,a,b, N. Tantidanaib, S. Nookabkaewb and D. Nacaprichaa,b

a Trace Element Lab., Institute of Science and Technology Research and Development, Mahidol Univ., Rama VI Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
b Dep. of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol Univ., Rama VI Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagram of a continuous-flow system.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Extractograms at varying Step II temperatures for a 0.25-g sample of SRM 2710 soil with a 10-mL extraction chamber volume; subfraction volume, 20 mL; ambient temperature ({diamondsuit}), 65°C ({blacksquare}) and 80°C ({blacktriangleup}). Temperatures of Steps I and III were kept constant at ambient and 55°C, respectively.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Change of pH of the extract during continuous-flow extraction. Sample, 0.25 g SRM 2710 soil; chamber volume, 10 mL; subfraction, 20 mL.

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of varying acetic acid concentration on metal fraction distribution in soil (SRM 2710). Sample weight, 0.25 g; chamber volume, 10 mL; temperatures of Steps I, II, and III were ambient, 65°C, and 55°C, respectively.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of varying hydroxylamine concentration on metal fraction distribution in soil (SRM 2710). Sample weight, 0.25 g; chamber volume, 10 mL; temperatures of Steps I, II, and III were ambient, 65°C, and 55°C, respectively.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Flow rate of extraction at various sample weight to chamber volume ratios. 1:12, 3-mL chamber ({diamondsuit}); 1:20, 3-mL chamber (•); 1:20, 10-mL chamber ({blacktriangleup}); 1:40, 10-mL chamber ({blacksquare}). Sample, SRM 2710 soil; subfraction volume, 15 mL. Extraction time for three-step procedure is also indicated on each graphical plot.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Extractograms of sequential extraction of Ca ({diamondsuit}), Fe ({blacksquare}), Mn ({blacktriangleup}), Cu ({circ}), and Zn (•) for SRM 2710 soil. Sample, 0.25 g; chamber volume, 10 mL; subfraction volume, 15 mL. Temperature of Steps II and III were 65 and 55°C, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.