JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiikkilä, O.
Right arrow Articles by Fritze, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiikkilä, O.
Right arrow Articles by Fritze, H.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kiikkilä, O.
Right arrow Articles by Fritze, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Microbiology
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Soil Biochemistry

In Situ Bioremediation through Mulching of Soil Polluted by a Copper–Nickel Smelter

Oili Kiikkilä*,a, Jonna Perkiömäkia, Matthew Barnettea, John Deromeb, Taina Pennanena, Esa Tulisaloc and Hannu Fritzea

a Vantaa Research Center, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 18, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland
b Rovaniemi Research Station, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 16, FIN-96301 Rovaniemi, Finland
c Dep. of Limnology and Environmental Protection, P.O. Box 62, FIN-00014 Univ. of Helsinki, Finland



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Plot of the untreated (U) and the treated (T) sample plots of the last sampling date on the first canonical variables, CHEM (the chemical data set) and BIOL (the biological data set) from canonical correlation analysis. The arrows indicate the influence of the most important variables on formation of the canonical variables.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (MDS) ordination of the sample plots with respect to sampling date and treatments. Symbols indicate the mean of 18 replicate untreated (U) and treated (T) plots, and bars indicate the standard deviation of the replicates.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Plot of the untreated (U) and the treated (T) sample plots of the last sampling date in autumn 1998 from multidimensional scaling (MDS) ordination in Fig. 2.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.