JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Louchart, X.
Right arrow Articles by Moussa, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Louchart, X.
Right arrow Articles by Moussa, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Louchart, X.
Right arrow Articles by Moussa, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Water Pollution

Herbicide Transport to Surface Waters at Field and Watershed Scales in a Mediterranean Vineyard Area

Xavier Louchart, Marc Voltz, Patrick Andrieux and Roger Moussa

Laboratory of Soil Science, INRA, 2 place Viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France



View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Transversal section and location of monitoring sites on the Roujan watershed.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Average topsoil concentrations of diuron and simazine for no-till and tilled fields, 1997. Error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Observed values of daily rainfall (a), runoff recorded at the outlet of the no-till field (b) and tilled field (c), and average concentrations in diuron (d) and simazine (e) during runoff events on the no-till and tilled fields, 1997. Dashed line indicates the analytical limit of detection. Concentrations under this detection limit were set to 0.025 µg L-1 for graphical representation.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Event losses of diuron and simazine and cumulative losses of herbicides and storm flow volume for both fields (a and b) and watershed (c) during the monitoring period, 1997. Note that cumulative losses are expressed as the proportion of the seasonal losses.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Observed values of daily rainfall (a), watershed runoff (b), piezometric level (c), and average concentrations in diuron (d) and simazine (e) in storm flow, baseflow, and ground water, 1997. Dashed line indicates the analytical limit of detection. Concentrations under this detection limit were set to 0.025 µg L-1 for graphical representation.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Comparison of average concentrations in diuron (a) and simazine (b) during runoff events at the outlets of the two fields and the watershed, 1997.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.